The most unfair of life/death choice
I've been wondering....
It is quite obvious that had Sarah survived to the end of Episode 4, the two most vulnerable survivors in the group would be Sarah herself and the baby.
If it came down to a point where you would have to save either the baby or Sarah in another life/death situation, who would you choose to save and why? Let's for the sake of the question that choosing one person to save ensures that person's life for the long term, while not choosing another ensures death for that unfortunate soul.
Is it all about whether or not a person is a liability or a burden? Is it about which person is a bigger liability and a burden? Is it about friendship? Is it about who is more special, more deserving because he/she is a helpless baby/troubled girl? Is it something else entirely?
And does any of the choices anyone would make in this situation represent correct or wrong?