Basically what happened was this girl was told to leave the class by the teacher because of her cell phone or something and she said no, so then they got the vice principal, or principal etc to get her to go but she wouldn't listen so they ended up calling the police and she still didn't budge so the cop goes off on her. I don't think what he did was right, but it could have been avoided if the girl was co-operative.
After Remember Me bombed, they seemed to be in pretty bad shape. I think they even filed for bankrupcy? Good thing they're doing fine now, after LIS. Would be a shame if all those people lost their jobs.
If you haven't heard it yet, here is a link to the full audio that contains the parts that were cut out between max and Chloe. Max and Chloe Why DONTNOD, just why!
If you haven't heard it yet, here is a link to the full audio that contains the parts that were cut out between max and Chloe. Max and Chloe Why DONTNOD, just why!
Well, I mean, saving Chloe didn't just cause the storm, it caused the eclipse, the moons, the dying animals etc...so there's no real reason to think that the storm is the final thing is that vein tbh.
Sure, apparently she refused to cope with the cop, and of course she was wrong, but the cop should know how to deal with this kind of situation without using excessive violence.
Gotta love how everyone judges without knowing what occurred before hand. For all we know she did something really bad. The other students sure as hell weren't jumping to defend her.
This year's golden joystick awards was... stupid... ( yay for Ashely Burch btw). If a broken game can win second place for game of the year (batman) then why are people trying so hard? this is STUPID!
then why give you the choice to save Chloe one final time if they just plan to keep killing her and killing her, it would take the whole meaning out of sacrificing everyone for her leaving those who chose that ending even more pissed.
Well, I mean, saving Chloe didn't just cause the storm, it caused the eclipse, the moons, the dying animals etc...so there's no real reason to think that the storm is the final thing is that vein tbh.
This year's golden joystick awards was... stupid... ( yay for Ashely Burch btw). If a broken game can win second place for game of the year (batman) then why are people trying so hard? this is STUPID!
Sure, apparently she refused to cope with the cop, and of course she was wrong, but the cop should know how to deal with this kind of situation without using excessive violence.
The game wont ever show what happens, but to be honest the game makes it clear that max caused chaos by changing time, continuing to change time will cause more chaos.
Max in the sacrifice the town ending turns into one of the most selfish, stupid characters of all time and shows she really learned absolutely nothing. Its not out of character in my opinion though as it takes the character being told several times that she caused everything for her to get it and even then it takes chloe of all people to tell her what they have to do to fix it.
then why give you the choice to save Chloe one final time if they just plan to keep killing her and killing her, it would take the whole meaning out of sacrificing everyone for her leaving those who chose that ending even more pissed.
I disagree, the story was decent but its not anything thats not been done before. Plus the game was good not great, it had a lot of dialogue and pacing issues, particularly at the start and end.
Also what moment was the best gaming moment for you?
LIS was nominated 5 times and it won nothing, apart from the Ashly Burch one.
The game deserved 1st place for Best Storytelling, and Best Gaming Moment.
LIS was nominated 5 times and it won nothing, apart from the Ashly Burch one.
The game deserved 1st place for Best Storytelling, and Best Gaming Moment.
then why give you the choice to save Chloe one final time if they just plan to keep killing her and killing her, it would take the whole meaning out of sacrificing everyone for her leaving those who chose that ending even more pissed.
as you said before, everything is a guess, I still stand by my opinion though on the assumption that after saving chloe she wont use her powers anymore.
I can't really answer that. Since the game's co-director, Michel Koch, commented on how this was a "fresh start" for Max and Chloe… more, and how it was pretty much a trade between the lives of the citzens of AB, I'd like to think that's not the case. In that regard, it sounds almost like a ritual for Chloe's 'resurrection'.
But chloe's still alive? Thats the biggest change there is, and now with everyone else dead its going to get even worse. Plus when chloe inevitably dies again max will use her power for sure.
Max rewinding time doesnt do anything (which is why the world fixes itself) its just if she changes time. And chloe being alive continues to change time. And a tornado came from just chloe; the town being destroyed would be a national event, leading to massive changes.
as you said before, everything is a guess, I still stand by my opinion though on the assumption that after saving chloe she wont use her powers anymore.
I'd like thorough scrutiny of how the tornado came to be and how those events rised. And how causing alterations to timeline such as preventing someone's death be the center of a disater, how is nature so human focused to even cause disasters? So because Chloe died, she wouldn't breathe and that air wouldn't have caused tornado but if she lived her mighty breath through chaos theory and intensified butterfly effect made changes to cause a big tornado? Who gave Max her powers in the first place regardless if whether it was a paradox of a future Max going back in time and forgetting the future, then starting episode 1 events? Then us repeating the cycle for all I care? Is it like that? *****************PREDESTINATION SPOILER*************** the infinitely time looping event of Predestination movie by Ethan Hawke? ********
Although I loved the game, they left many plot holes in it. You also have to remember that the last EP was changed and I think at one time there was supposed to be more than the two ending we got. Perhaps some of those questions were answered or at least hinted at in the parts that were changed. For me, I think the storm was caused by Prescott. I also think max was given her powers to set things right, which meant saving Chloe (I remind you that when she first saw the girl, she didn't know it was Chloe she was saving), since she was also instrumental in helping Max uncover the truth. The first few ep's lead me to think that maybe DONTNOD would dare to be different in that they would end the game with the same old cliche on time travel. Turns out I was wrong. Maybe it would have been different before the change, but we may never know.
I'd like thorough scrutiny of how the tornado came to be and how those events rised. And how causing alterations to timeline such … moreas preventing someone's death be the center of a disater, how is nature so human focused to even cause disasters? So because Chloe died, she wouldn't breathe and that air wouldn't have caused tornado but if she lived her mighty breath through chaos theory and intensified butterfly effect made changes to cause a big tornado? Who gave Max her powers in the first place regardless if whether it was a paradox of a future Max going back in time and forgetting the future, then starting episode 1 events? Then us repeating the cycle for all I care? Is it like that? *****************PREDESTINATION SPOILER*************** the infinitely time looping event of Predestination movie by Ethan Hawke? ********
Well let's just hope they will fix it now that it won 2nd place. Also I didn't say that The witcher 3 was bad, I liked it so much, but still I didn't feel anything for the characters, the story was good but LIS's was better (my opinion).
If a broken game can win second place for game of the year (batman) then why are people trying so hard?
Arkham Knight was… more broken on PC. On PS4 and Xbox One, the game ran fine, which are the versions most critics played the game on.
The game deserved 1st place for Best Storytelling, and Best Gaming Moment.
Yeah...I'm just going to say I disagree and leave it there.
I played The witcher 3 and I liked it, the story was good (and not great too) but I wasn't that invested in it, when it comes to LIS a lot of moments comes in mind when I think of "best gaming moment" unlike The witcher 3. Again this is only my opinion.
I disagree, the story was decent but its not anything thats not been done before. Plus the game was good not great, it had a lot of dialogue and pacing issues, particularly at the start and end.
Also what moment was the best gaming moment for you?
It's cheap way out to use something like "chaos theory" instead of spend weeks to write the reasoning behind everything supernatural that happens in the plot.
Then presenting all that in-game without making it long exposition dump where the protagonist finds that "one" who will explain "everything."
I'd like thorough scrutiny of how the tornado came to be and how those events rised. And how causing alterations to timeline such … moreas preventing someone's death be the center of a disater, how is nature so human focused to even cause disasters? So because Chloe died, she wouldn't breathe and that air wouldn't have caused tornado but if she lived her mighty breath through chaos theory and intensified butterfly effect made changes to cause a big tornado? Who gave Max her powers in the first place regardless if whether it was a paradox of a future Max going back in time and forgetting the future, then starting episode 1 events? Then us repeating the cycle for all I care? Is it like that? *****************PREDESTINATION SPOILER*************** the infinitely time looping event of Predestination movie by Ethan Hawke? ********
I think I've read that the writers said it was left open, so that players can come up with whatever headcanons they want? I'm not too sure on that. I think it was supposed to show that Max and Chloe's bond (wether it's romantic or just a really close friendship depending on the players' choices) was stonger than ever, but they didn't have the budget. I mean, even Shenmue 3's budget is slightly larger, and that's through Kickstarter.
Comments
..that's a guess, though. We don't actually know that's true.
My teacher showed us this.
Basically what happened was this girl was told to leave the class by the teacher because of her cell phone or something and she said no, so then they got the vice principal, or principal etc to get her to go but she wouldn't listen so they ended up calling the police and she still didn't budge so the cop goes off on her. I don't think what he did was right, but it could have been avoided if the girl was co-operative.
We don't know what isn't and is true after ep 5, but Its the most logical explanation I think.
Hey guys, i just bought the game an- AAAAAAHHHHH SPOILERS!
Then again to healthy competition to work, jobs should be lost.
Otherwise some kind of coalition whatever starts forming up between the companies.
I just mean, company that exist purely to have people to keep their jobs sounds fishy.
If you haven't heard it yet, here is a link to the full audio that contains the parts that were cut out between max and Chloe. Max and Chloe Why DONTNOD, just why!
I think it's pretty obvious disasters will continue until Chloe is dead, maybe not even then unless she died as she oringinally did.
Jesus, that should never have been cut from the game. I know, Max's action speaks louder than words, but I would have loved to hear her say it.
Here's another one, that was cut from the sacrifice Chloe ending: http://chloepriceprotectionsquad.tumblr.com/post/132101910994/this-audio-takes-place-when-max-is-on-the-cliff
Max: "Chloe... au revoir" ;__;
Well, I mean, saving Chloe didn't just cause the storm, it caused the eclipse, the moons, the dying animals etc...so there's no real reason to think that the storm is the final thing is that vein tbh.
Sure, apparently she refused to cope with the cop, and of course she was wrong, but the cop should know how to deal with this kind of situation without using excessive violence.
This year's golden joystick awards was... stupid... ( yay for Ashely Burch btw). If a broken game can win second place for game of the year (batman) then why are people trying so hard? this is STUPID!
then why give you the choice to save Chloe one final time if they just plan to keep killing her and killing her, it would take the whole meaning out of sacrificing everyone for her leaving those who chose that ending even more pissed.
witcher 3 basically won everything.
"Max why are all these strangers at my funeral?"
Not a knock against the pic by the way the pic is amazing. It's a knock against the game ending.
I'm just saying 100 students at the school protested for the police officer. Not against him
LIS was nominated 5 times and it won nothing, apart from the Ashly Burch one.
The game deserved 1st place for Best Storytelling, and Best Gaming Moment.
The game wont ever show what happens, but to be honest the game makes it clear that max caused chaos by changing time, continuing to change time will cause more chaos.
Max in the sacrifice the town ending turns into one of the most selfish, stupid characters of all time and shows she really learned absolutely nothing. Its not out of character in my opinion though as it takes the character being told several times that she caused everything for her to get it and even then it takes chloe of all people to tell her what they have to do to fix it.
I disagree, the story was decent but its not anything thats not been done before. Plus the game was good not great, it had a lot of dialogue and pacing issues, particularly at the start and end.
Also what moment was the best gaming moment for you?
Was there an award for Music at all? If so, why the HELL didin't Life is Strange win it?
Arkham Knight was broken on PC. On PS4 and Xbox One, the game ran fine, which are the versions most critics played the game on.
Yeah...I'm just going to say I disagree and leave it there.
Well, isn't that the point? A decision between letting go and accepting that she should have died, rather than continuing to try to keep her alive?
as you said before, everything is a guess, I still stand by my opinion though on the assumption that after saving chloe she wont use her powers anymore.
THAT SOUNDS INCREDIBLY COOL THE WAY YOU SAY IT, LIKE MAX IS A SHAMAN
For those who have chosen to save Chloe in the end and have no regrets, "they will recover from this tragedy together"
But chloe's still alive? Thats the biggest change there is, and now with everyone else dead its going to get even worse. Plus when chloe inevitably dies again max will use her power for sure.
Max rewinding time doesnt do anything (which is why the world fixes itself) its just if she changes time. And chloe being alive continues to change time. And a tornado came from just chloe; the town being destroyed would be a national event, leading to massive changes.
I'd like thorough scrutiny of how the tornado came to be and how those events rised. And how causing alterations to timeline such as preventing someone's death be the center of a disater, how is nature so human focused to even cause disasters? So because Chloe died, she wouldn't breathe and that air wouldn't have caused tornado but if she lived her mighty breath through chaos theory and intensified butterfly effect made changes to cause a big tornado? Who gave Max her powers in the first place regardless if whether it was a paradox of a future Max going back in time and forgetting the future, then starting episode 1 events? Then us repeating the cycle for all I care? Is it like that? *****************PREDESTINATION SPOILER*************** the infinitely time looping event of Predestination movie by Ethan Hawke? ********
Although I loved the game, they left many plot holes in it. You also have to remember that the last EP was changed and I think at one time there was supposed to be more than the two ending we got. Perhaps some of those questions were answered or at least hinted at in the parts that were changed. For me, I think the storm was caused by Prescott. I also think max was given her powers to set things right, which meant saving Chloe (I remind you that when she first saw the girl, she didn't know it was Chloe she was saving), since she was also instrumental in helping Max uncover the truth. The first few ep's lead me to think that maybe DONTNOD would dare to be different in that they would end the game with the same old cliche on time travel. Turns out I was wrong. Maybe it would have been different before the change, but we may never know.
Well let's just hope they will fix it now that it won 2nd place. Also I didn't say that The witcher 3 was bad, I liked it so much, but still I didn't feel anything for the characters, the story was good but LIS's was better (my opinion).
I played The witcher 3 and I liked it, the story was good (and not great too) but I wasn't that invested in it, when it comes to LIS a lot of moments comes in mind when I think of "best gaming moment" unlike The witcher 3. Again this is only my opinion.
There was.
Oh, I like this one.
Among them there was another image here
It's cheap way out to use something like "chaos theory" instead of spend weeks to write the reasoning behind everything supernatural that happens in the plot.
Then presenting all that in-game without making it long exposition dump where the protagonist finds that "one" who will explain "everything."
I think I've read that the writers said it was left open, so that players can come up with whatever headcanons they want? I'm not too sure on that. I think it was supposed to show that Max and Chloe's bond (wether it's romantic or just a really close friendship depending on the players' choices) was stonger than ever, but they didn't have the budget. I mean, even Shenmue 3's budget is slightly larger, and that's through Kickstarter.
lmao warren trying to cop a feel xD
Hellaween.